Michael G. Donahue.jpg

Michael G. Donahue

mdonahue@stark-stark.com
609.895.7343

Michael G. Donahue, III, Shareholder, is a member of the Personal Injury Group and concentrates his practice on the preparation, settlement, and trial of personal injury matters. Mr. Donahue is certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Certified Civil Trial Attorney.

Mr. Donahue serves as an officer of the New Jersey Association for Justice Board of Governors and sits on its Executive Committee. He also serves on the Executive Committee of the Civil Trial Section of the New Jersey State Bar Association. Mr. Donahue is a member of the Mercer County Bar Association; New Jersey State Bar Association; and the American Association for Justice.

Entries authored by Michael G. Donahue

How Are Judicial and Prosecutorial Offices in New Jersey Appointed?

Since 1969, the New Jersey State Bar Association has been the only non-political element in the appointment process for judicial and prosecutorial offices in New Jersey. The State Bar Association, through an agreement with New Jersey governors since Governor Richard J. Hughes, reviews the qualifications of candidates for the nominated judicial and prosecutorial positions and reports to the governor its position regarding the candidate’s fitness to serve in the nominated position. This agreement is known as the Judicial Compact. Governor Christopher J. Christie reaffirmed the current Judicial Compact on April 10, 2010.

The Judicial Compact’s review process is handled by the State Bar Association’s Judicial and Prosecutorial Appointments Committee (JPAC). The Committee’s review operates under complete confidentiality. Once the Committee reaches a conclusion with regard to a candidate, the Chair of the JPAC communicates the Committee’s determination of whether a nominated candidate is qualified or not qualified directly to the governor’s office only. If the Governor continues to persist with the nomination despite a “not qualified” determination, the State Bar Association may testify before the State Senate Judiciary committee concerning its determination regarding the nominee’s fitness for the position of Supreme Court justice and the reasons for that position.  

Recently, Governor Christie nominated Philip Kwon and Bruce Harris as potential state Supreme Court Justices. In a statement released by New Jersey State Bar Association’s President Susan A. Feeney, the State Bar Association has fully committed to honoring the spirit and intent of the Agreement between itself and Governor Christie. The State Bar Association will continue to evaluate all candidates thoroughly and will make no comments regarding the specific nominees regarding their review until such time that the reviews are concluded.  President’s Feeney’s comments can be found online here.

Michael Donahue is a Shareholder and in the firm's Lawrenceville, New Jersey office, specializing in Accident & Personal Injury Law. For more information, please contact Mr. Donahue.

Tire Defect Litigation: Bead Failures

The component which allows a passenger or truck tire to be operated without a tube is referred to as the tire’s bead. It is a bundle of wires wrapped together and utilized inside the rubber which contacts the rim.  They are made in various configurations depending on the manufacturer.  A bead can fail during the mounting and inflation process with devastating consequences.  When a  bead failure occurs, there is a sudden loss of pressure which can turn the tire wheel assembly into a projectile injuring or killing the mechanic.

Beads may be defectively manufactured resulting in failure at low inflation pressures.  Also, a bead can “hang up” during the mounting and inflation process. When a bead fails, it usually does so at its “splice” which is where the two ends meet.  
    
Tire/rim mismatch can result in bead failure.  Due to the design of 16.5 inch rims, a 16 inch tire can pass over the flange of the rim with some effort.  16.5 rims are uncommon today and some mechanics lack familiarity with the potential mismatch which can be deadly.  If the mismatch is not detected and inflation is commenced, the bead may fail during the inflation process at pressures within the maximum recommended inflation pressure.  In mismatch cases, the rim manufacturer as well as the manufacturer of the tire changing machine are potential defendants.   

If you, your family, or your friends are injured as a result of a tire failure, it is important to call an attorney experienced in investigating tire failure.  These cases can be complex and expensive and should be handled by an attorney who has experience in this specialty.                    

Tire Defect Litigation: Multi-Piece and Split Rim Explosions

As I mentioned in a previous post, tire defects can have serious consequences when not taken care of. In addition to environmental conditions which can adversely affect the performance of a tire, there are also internal design and manufacturing defects which could lead to serious injuries as well.

The exploding components of a failed multi-piece wheel assembly have earned the nickname “widow makers.” Multi-piece wheels are two or three piece assemblies which require tube type tires. They are much less common then single piece wheels but can be found on garbage trucks or other heavy duty trucks.  
    
These assemblies utilize a split ring which secures the tire to the rim. The ring can appear to be properly seated on the rim prior to inflation when in fact it is not. If inflation takes place while the ring is not properly seated, the ring may suddenly release. Inflation of these types of tires must always be performed in a tire cage. Unfortunately, explosive separation can occur once the inflation process has been completed and the tire/wheel assembly is being mounted on the vehicle.

Multi-piece explosions can result in various types of potential defect cases. First, a design defect claim can be brought based upon the availability of a single piece design which does not present the same hazards and provides the same utility in certain applications. Also, allegations of design defects have been made due to the potential to mismatch components which can result in explosions. Negligence claims may also be available if a tire mechanic improperly services the assembly resulting in an explosion and subsequent injury.  

If you, your family, or your friends are injured as a result of a tire failure, it is important to call an attorney experienced in investigating tire failure. These cases can be complex and expensive and should be handled by an attorney who has experience in this specialty.

Tire Defect Litigation: Do you know how old your tires are?

Tire aging has become an area of great concern. For many years, the life of a tire has been defined by its use and condition such as tread depth and sidewall condition. It is now clear that deterioration within the tire can occur over time which increases the likelihood of catastrophic failure.  

Heat and oxygen are both enemies to tires. They work to degrade the internal adhesion of tire components. Environmental conditions such as exposure to sunlight or salty air also may adversely affect tires as they age. Tread separation is a typical failure mode of an aged tire.  

The Department of Transportation number molded into the tire’s side provides information regarding a tire’s age. Unfortunately, decoding the age from the number is not easy for the lay person. The last four digits of the number represent the month and year the tire was manufactured.  

The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration issued a Consumer Advisory regarding aged tires on June 2, 2008 which recommends replacing tires which are more than six years old. Many manufacturers have adopted warnings which direct the same.  

If you, your family, or your friends are injured as a result of a tire failure, it is important to call an attorney experienced in investigating tire failure. These cases can be complex and expensive and should be handled by an attorney who has experience in this specialty.

Social Networking and the Client: Are they prepared?

In previous posts, we have discussed the impact of social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. These sites are used to communicate, using words and photographs, with close and distant “friends.” Often times, this communication occurs on impulse without consideration of who may have access to the information.  

Social networking communication may become discoverable in civil litigation and the client must understand this upon retaining a lawyer. To adequately protect a client and permit the client to protect him or herself, certain steps should be taken at the onset of representation. We previously discussed three ways to help the client and here are four more.

Consider using an outside service to monitor the social networking activities of a client. This may be useful for clients that are committed to continuing to use these sites very frequently. They can be useful for making sure the lawyer has knowledge of all communication the client participates in and friends whom the client has developed. It is also helpful for attorneys, or staff, who lack the knowledge, time or resources to perform such searches themselves.

It is also important to make certain the client is fully aware of the potential threat that “friends” can pose. Generally, privacy settings will allow “friends”, or other specially designated individuals, access to more private information shared by the client. The client must understand that making a person a friend is allowing such access and they should give careful thought and consideration to these issues before allowing someone such access. Requests from unknown persons should be denied. Additionally, the client must be careful what information they share with “friends” as this information can then be easily shared with other unknown individuals. A client must make sure their “friends” do not indiscriminately share the client’s private information.  

Further, the client should be aware that photographs can be easily shared and can be particularly damaging. Many times a photograph of a client can be misleading because it shows a smiling face, but the photos fail to reveal the pain the client is truly experiencing. Because Facebook and other sites provide nearly effortless means to share photographs, a client must understand that any photo they post may eventually be obtained by an adversary in a lawsuit.  

These are some thoughts in how a client should be made aware of the pitfalls of social networking. Next time we are going to discuss other aspects of social networking in litigation.

Tire Failures: Is The Tire Manufacturer Responsible?

Tire failures can result in catastrophic consequences. Most accidents can be avoided by following the tire manufacturer’s instructions and performing proper maintenance. Unfortunately, defects, both manufacturing and design, are causes of a number of failures. If a defect in the tire caused the failure, the tire manufacturer may be responsible for the harm that is caused

Failures can occur during both operation of the vehicle as well as maintenance of the tire. When a tire fails during operation, the operator can experience a sudden loss of control resulting in vehicle rollover or crash. They also fail during mounting and other maintenance resulting in explosive separation of the tire and the rim. The failed tire/wheel assembly becomes a projectile often seriously injuring or killing the tire mechanic or bystanders.

One type of tire failure is known as tread-belt separation. Tires can catastrophically fail in service when the tire tread and belts detach from the carcass or remaining belts of the tire.  Tread belt separation occurs when there is a break down in the adhesion between the steel belts and rubber tread. A number of factors can cause the adhesion between the belt and rubber to fail. Weak or improper compounds, contamination during manufacturing, and other problems can cause the initiation of cracks between the belts and treads. These cracks can continue to develop during the use of the tire. Heat or friction within the tire can speed up this process. Ultimately, this can result in separation and the potential for catastrophic failure of the tire. Under these circumstances, the vehicle can become unstable and difficult to control resulting in vehicle rollover or other terrible consequences.  

Public awareness of these accidents has increased as a result of the rise in the number of crashes involving Firestone tires which were equipped on Ford Explorers during the late 1990s. Strong safety concerns surfaced after a number of tread separations allegedly resulted in vehicle rollovers. This prompted a recall of certain Firestone tires.

If you, your family, or your friends are injured as a result of a tire failure, it is important to call an attorney experienced in investigating tire failure. These cases can be complex and expensive and should be handled by an attorney who has experience in this specialty.

Social Networking and the Client: Are They Prepared?

As I mentioned in a previous post, social networking is a part of the fabric of most adult lives. We use Facebook to communicate with close and distant “friends.”  We post photographs and comment on others on impulse, often without a second thought.  

Social networking communication may become discoverable in civil litigation and the client must understand this upon retaining a lawyer.  To adequately protect a client and permit the client to protect him or herself, certain steps should be taken at the onset of representation.  Today, we will discuss three.

First, the lawyer must understand the scope or universe of social networking activity. Does the client have a Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace, Twitter or other online profile? If so, what forms of communication does the client engage in? Ask these questions immediately and make sure the client understands that they must inform you if new activities are commenced.

Second, the lawyer must consider reviewing the activities to date. The client should provide their login and password information so the lawyer may review the activity to date. This will allow the lawyer to understand how the particular client utilizes social networking and, therefore, make the lawyer’s ability to advise the client more informed and relevant.  Also, the lawyer can assess whether any damaging or helpful information is present.

Finally, make sure the client understands the privacy settings. Clients must understand that they need to be vigilant to protect their privacy and this starts with appropriate privacy settings on all of their accounts.

Next time we will discuss three additional steps regarding a client’s social networking activity that the lawyer should consider upon engagement.

Rule 26(a): Eliminates the Discovery of Draft Expert Reports & Attorney-Expert Communication

On December 1, 2010, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to eliminate the discovery of draft expert reports and some attorney-expert communication. This new revision makes the Federal Rules consistent with New Jersey state court practice regarding these aspects of expert discovery.

The revised rule protects as work product “drafts of any report or disclosure required under Rule 26(a), regardless the form in which the draft is recorded.” The rule also protects from disclosure “communications between the a party’s attorney and any witness required to provide a report[.]” There are three types of communications which are specifically carved out as discoverable. They are as follows: 

  1. Communications related to compensation;
  2. Facts or data provided by the attorney that the expert considered in forming his or her opinions; and
  3. Assumptions provided by the attorney that the expert relied upon in forming his or her opinion.

For many, this is a welcome change to the Federal Rules. This revision will eliminate the complicated and contorted steps that some attorneys and experts have taken to avoid creating discoverable documents. It may also reduce the need for two sets of experts-consulting and testifying. By allowing protected communication between the expert and the attorney, the Rules recognize that experts both provide opinions to establish crucial issues before the Court, but also play a role in preparing and teaching the attorney regarding important substantive issue. In this manner, the revisions will not doubt reduce expert witnesses costs and complications regarding communication.

An Introduction to the Discovery of Social Networking Activity

Social networking has quickly become a commonplace means of communication by and between Americans. The statistics are impressive. 75% of all adults between 18 and 24 have an online profile. About one-third of all adults engage in some form of online social networking. If Facebook was a nation, it would be the fourth largest in the world. For lawyers and clients, the question has become to what extent is this activity discoverable during civil litigation.

Generally, electronically stored information is discoverable if it is reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. See R. 4:10-2(a); Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 34.  The Federal Rules specifically require that the Joint Discovery Plan address “any issues about disclosure or discovery of electronically stored information.” Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(f)(3)(C).  

Various means of discovery can be utilized to seek such information from an adversary. These include Interrogations; Requests for Admissions; Requests for Production of Documents and Things; and Depositions. Subpoenas can also be used to obtain discovery from third parties such as service providers.

Several courts have recently considered the discoverability of an individual’s social networking activity. Next time we will discuss a couple of these decisions and some the arguments for obtaining and resisting the discovery of social networking activity.

Contact Us

How can we help? Any information you provide is considered confidential and will not be shared outside of our firm.