Andrew M. Salmon.jpg

Andrew Salmon

asalmon@stark-stark.com
609.895.7399

Andrew M. Salmon is a Shareholder and member of Stark & Stark's Accident & Personal Injury Group. Prior to joining Stark & Stark, Mr. Salmon was an assistant prosecutor with the Mercer County (NJ), Special Investigations Unit; prosecuting attorney for the City of Richmond Heights, St. Louis, MO and assistant prosecutor, St. Louis County, MO. He also had his own practice in St. Louis with an emphasis on criminal defense. His experience includes federal. state, and municipal criminal and civil trial and appellate practice. Mr. Salmon recently received a jury verdict of $2,175,000 for a Plaintiff in a motor vehicle lawsuit in Atlantic City, N.J. Lupinacci vs. City of Atlantic City.

Entries authored by Andrew M. Salmon

Playground Accidents: what you need to know in order to keep your child safe

Each year in the United States, emergency departments treat more than 200,000 children ages 14 and younger for playground-related injuries. About 45% of playground-related injuries include severe fractures, internal injuries, concussions, dislocations, and amputations. Additionally, about 75% of non-fatal injuries related to playground equipment occur on public playgrounds, with most of these accidents occurring at schools and daycare centers.

Between 1990 and 2000, 147 children ages 14 and younger died from playground-related injuries. Of them, 82 died from strangulation and 31 died from falls to the playground surface. Most of these deaths occurred on home playgrounds.

Many of the injuries come from falls from the equipment, such as monkey bars, swings and slides. Some inherent dangers are the culprit in many of these cases is the design and installation of the equipment, or, in most cases, the maintenance and upkeep of the ground surface under and around the equipment.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission's Handbook for Public Playground Safety provides standards to promote greater safety awareness for those who purchase, install, and maintain public playground equipment.  It sets forth the acceptable type and depth of surfacing material under and around playground equipment to minimizing the potential for injury.  For example, there should be a minimum of 10 inches of shredded rubber over the higher (10 feet).  There should be a minimum of 9 inches of sand under equipment that has a fall height of 4 feet.

In New Jersey, Governmental and for-profit private entities operating playgrounds are governed by the playground safety guidelines of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (Handbook for Public Playground Safety) “Playground Safety Subcode.”  The guidelines set forth mandatory guidelines for the design, installation, inspection and maintenance of playgrounds and playground equipment.

Even when these guidelines for installation and requisite surface materials are met, there is a recurring danger of injury as the equipment is used.  Surface material decomposes, compresses or gets displaced. Constant maintenance is necessary to ensure the safety of the children using the equipment.

Once equipment and surfacing material is installed in a public playground according to manufacturer's instructions and national standards and guidelines, it must be maintained in order to remain safe.

Andrew Salmon is a member of Stark & Stark’s Lawrenceville, New Jersey office, concentrating in Accident & Personal Injury Law. For more information, please contact Mr. Salmon.

Swimming Pool Liability: how to prevent devestating accidents from happening again next year

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention there were 3,308 unintentional drowning-related deaths in the United States in 2004 and as well as an estimated 5,000 unintentional drowning-related incidents each year.

These statistics are horrific and, in many cases, preventable. Kids are kids and will gravitate towards the cool blue water, where they see others playing, even if they know they cannot swim.  Guards get distracted. Parents, assuming the lifeguards are doing their jobs, doze off or bury themselves in a book. All too often, we read in the paper about a child drowning at a public pool, while guards are on duty and there are literally hundreds of people around witnessing the event.  And we wonder “how could this happen”?  

Proving liability in a pool-related accident is similar to the way in which we prove liability in a motor vehicle or slip and fall case. The liability rests on acting reasonably. Was there a qualified lifeguard on duty?  Were there enough lifeguards for the amount of swimmers?  Were the lifeguards properly trained and certified?  Was the pool safely and properly marked between deep and shallow ends?  Were the parents themselves negligent?  Are the homeowners at fault?  Did the hosts even ascertain if the children could swim, or did they assume every kids wearing trunks could?

As summer comes to a close, I think back about the many cases I heard of this summer which could have been prevented. I hope next year will be different.

Andrew Salmon is a member of Stark & Stark’s Lawrenceville, New Jersey office, concentrating in Accident & Personal Injury Law. For more information, please contact Mr. Salmon.

Interplay Between A Workers' Compensation Accident and Third Party Accident

When someone is injured on the job, or “during the course and scope of his employment,” the accident falls under Workers’ Compensation laws. One does not file a lawsuit against his employer, but rather, he merely makes a workers’ compensation claim.

The general rule is that you cannot “sue” your employer. In other words, when you are injured during the job, you file a claim, not a lawsuit. You are entitled to certain benefits, such as lost wages, medical treatment and temporary disability.  When you are done with treatment and are ready to return to the workforce, or if you are not able to because of the injury, you receive an “award.”
 
But what happens if you are injured during your work by an outside, third party?  In this case, the law DOES permit you to have two claims.  That is, a workers’ comp claim, AND a third party claim against the party who caused the accident/injuries.  I handle these third party cases often.

To someone who has never filed a workers’ compensation claim, or has even been in an accident before, I explain it using this example:
 
Suppose you work for Fed Ex. You go to work each day, load up your truck, and make your deliveries. One day while loading your truck, you fall of the dock and break your leg. In this instance you have a true workers’ compensation case. You would then file a claim, and you would receive certain benefits.

Now suppose you are that same worker loads the truck and is out making deliveries, when a drunk driver runs a red light and T bones you?

You now have a workers’ compensation claim (because it happened while working), but you also have a claim against the drunk driver. This is referred to as a third party claim.

For the most part, the third party rides the coattails of the workers’ compensation case. The injured party is treated by workers’ compensation doctors, compensated for lost wages, offered temporary disability benefits, and at the end of treatment, typically receives an award or settlement.  

At the same time, a claim is made against the third party driver’s carrier. The third party case could also settle, or it could have to be tried. In the event that we are able to secure a settlement, or favorable award at trial, that amount could be (and in many cases is) subject to a workers’ compensation lien. This means that the employer who paid for the treatment, lost wages and disability, is entitled to recoup a majority of what is paid to its employee, from the third party.
 
To some, this does not seem fair. And I agree.

The conventional argument goes something like this:  I work for a company for 20 years, paying into their workers’ compensation fund. I get into one accident, and they want to take my third party settlement from me?

For the third party lawyer, their argument is:  I’m basically acting like a collection lawyer for the employer.

The employer’s carrier’s argument is equally compelling:  We paid X amount for the worker’s medical bills, temporary disability, wages, and award.  Why should we be penalized for a third party’s negligence?

Many times we are able to negotiate the lien with the workers’ compensation carrier, but sometimes we are not. No matter what the case may be, the first thing you should do is educate yourself on your rights. Be sure to know what you are entitled to and who you need to report to. Additionally, should you be injured in an accident and need assistance, please feel free to contact us. We would be happy to meet with you, free of charge, to review your case and assist you in obtaining any compensation you are entitled to.

No Liability Found for Sending Texts to Driver Just Before Crash

In May of this year, a Morris County Superior Court Judge held that one cannot be sued for allegedly helping to cause an accident by texting a driver. The decision was the subject of a few local radio shows – and the source of some concern for me, a plaintiff’s attorney, trying to defendant why one of my brethren would go after the non-driving texter.

The facts were straightforward and tragic. The plaintiffs were riding on a motorcycle when the defendant struck the plaintiff’s motorcycle, causing the plaintiffs to each lose a leg. The defendant admitted that at the time of the accident he had been texting his friend, stating, "The road was curving when the phone distracted me. I looked up and all I saw was the motorcycle coming at me." The defendant’s friend texted him at 5:48:23 PM; he texted her back 44 seconds later and then called 911 to report the crash just eight seconds after sending the text.

The Plaintiffs sued after learning the defendant had been texting, and added his friend claiming that she knew or should have known the defendant was driving. The defendant’s friend moved to be dismissed from the suit, and the judge agreed, finding that she had no duty of care owed to the plaintiffs.

Although most people believe it’s the defendant’s fault since he was the one who was texting and driving, and I do agree to that fact, I do not, however, believe that his friend was entirely without blame.

My question to those who believe the sender of the text should not be held liable: if you lost your leg, would you not explore all potential liable parties?  

I can agree with the judge’s decision based upon the facts and current law.  However, I think it begs the question: Is it the act of texting in and of itself that would have subjected her to possible liability? Or, could it be the content of the actual text? What if she had texted “don’t text and drive, I will see you when you get here” and he looked down to read it.

Although I believe the right decision was made in this case, I also think it’s important that in cases in the future, all facts are considered before reaching a conclusion.

Leaving the Scene of an Accident

Leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense in New Jersey and can result in fines, the suspension of your license, and in some cases even jail. This includes instances where both property damage and personal injury occur, as well as instances where only property damage has occurred. 

Clearly, those cases resulting in personal injury are more serious, but the penalties for leaving the scene of an accident resulting in only property damage are also very serious. 

If a driver, who knowingly is involved in an accident resulting in injury or death to any person or damage to any vehicle/property, must provide his name and address to the person injured or whose vehicle or property was damaged. The driver is also required to notify the nearest office of the local police department, and is required to render reasonable assistance to those injured if it is apparent that the treatment is necessary or is requested by the injured person.

If no other driver was involved, the law requires that the person leave a note with their name and contact information.  

Additionally, if you are caught having left the scene of an accident without taking the necessary steps to remedy the situation, you will be liable for any personal and/or property damage you caused.

Andrew Salmon is a member of Stark & Stark’s Lawrenceville, New Jersey office, specializing in Accident & Personal Injury Law. For more information, please contact Mr. Salmon.

Liability of Pedestrian Injuries on Sidewalks

In most cases, except for those containing negligence in regards to construction, a residential property owner is not liable if a pedestrian is injured as a result of the condition of the sidewalk on the landowner's property. However, the same is not true of commercial landowners who generally owe a greater duty to maintain sidewalks.

In determining whether a property is commercial or residential, courts traditionally address the nature and use of the property.  Obviously, if the property is owned for investment or business purposes, the property is classified as “commercial”.  

There are many instances where the use is not readily identifiable. For example, a residential property can still be classified as “commercial” if the owners do not live there and instead rent out the home. 

There may be additional immunities and defenses available when the sidewalk is in front of a religious, charitable or other nonprofit organization, again, depending upon the property usage.  A landowner using his property exclusively for charitable or religious purposes is generally not liable for injuries sustained by a pedestrian on the abutting sidewalk.  

For example, if the organization uses the property solely as a parish or rectory, the organization is not a “commercial” landowner.  Where there is mixed use however, say, where the property is a parish rectory and used for commercial purposes, liability will generally attach despite the non-profit status of the owners.  

Where property abutting the offending sidewalk is owned by religious or other nonprofit organizations, courts are directed to focus on the use of that property to determine whether to impose liability.

Each case is different, and therefore, it is imperative to do a diligent search of the property owner(s) and determine the true property usage. 

Andrew Salmon is a member of Stark & Stark’s Lawrenceville, New Jersey office, specializing in Accident & Personal Injury Law. For more information, please contact Mr. Salmon.

Common Questions Associated with Car Accidents

Do I have to tell my insurance company I was in an accident?
In New Jersey, most insurance companies require you to place them on notice of an accident within a set period of time. Failure to do so may result in denial of coverage. Before you say, “but I don’t want my insurance rates to go up”, think about having your insurance canceled for failure to report a claim. Which would be worse?  Additionally, insurance companies usually do not raise your rates when the accident was not your fault.

What insurance company do I have to use?
If the other driver is at fault, you may choose between your own insurance company (if you have New Jersey Collision or New Jersey Comprehensive coverage) or the negligent driver’s insurance company.

What about a deductible?
If you make a claim under your carrier, you will likely be charged a deductible. Your insurance carrier will then “subrogate” (seek reimbursement) from the negligent driver’s carrier. This reimbursement can, but does not always, include recouping your deductible.

What are some tips to remember in case I’m in an accident?

  • Always take pictures of the damage to your car, regardless of who does the repairs.  
  • Don’t be tempted to “over claim.”  The insurance company is only responsible for repairing the damage from the accident, or replacing the totaled car. An insurance company is not responsible for fixing the dent you caused in a separate accident last summer.
  • Regarding the value of a “totaled” car, insurance companies select one of three methods approved by the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance.
  • If the insurance adjuster (yours or theirs) is being unfair, i.e. is undervaluing the damage, is apportioning some fault to you, when you believe you did not cause the accident, or insists on repairing a car you believe to be totaled and perhaps unsafe, you should consult with an attorney. While property damage claims are generally fairly cut and dry, insurance adjusters are employees of the insurance company whose job it is to minimize exposure/loss.
  • If you sustained bodily injury, you should consult with an attorney. Some individuals unwittingly resolve “all claims” (property damage and personal injury) when they deal directly with the negligent party’s insurance company.

Andrew Salmon is a member of Stark & Stark’s Lawrenceville, New Jersey office, specializing in Accident & Personal Injury Law. For more information, please contact Mr. Salmon.

Be Sure to Remove Snow and Ice From Your Entire Car, Not Just the Windshield!

Did you know that New Jersey has a law on its books requiring you to make sure that snow and ice has been removed from your entire car before you hit the road?  In fact, police have issued over 3,200 tickets since the law took effect in October 2010.
 
Most people assume that so long as their windows are clear, they are safe.  However, this is not the case. Hard snow and ice accumulations routinely fly off while driving, creating dangerous conditions for other drivers whose cars are struck by the flying object itself, or who get spooked while trying to avoid these dangers.  
 
The law states that each driver of a motor vehicle (including commercial trucks, cabs and trailers) in this State shall have an affirmative duty to make all reasonable efforts to remove accumulated ice or snow from exposed surfaces of the motor vehicle prior to operation. These surfaces include the hood, trunk, windshield, windows, and roof of the motor vehicle.
 
The law does NOT apply to any driver who is operating during a snow or ice storm that began and continued for the duration of the motor vehicle's operation, or to any operator of a motor vehicle while it is parked.

Fines for violating the new law range from $25 to $75 if no injury or property damage occurs. If failure to remove ice and snow results in injury or property damage, motorists can face fines ranging from $200 to $1,000, while commercial motor vehicle drivers face fines ranging from $500 to $1,500, for each offense.

Perhaps the thought of having to spend the extra time in your pjs or work clothes, coupled with the non-point, relatively low fine, makes you say, "no thanks - I'll just get the windows."  
But the thought of causing damage to someone else' car, or worse yet, causing serious injury to others, will hopefully give you pause to remember and follow this law.

Andrew Salmon is a member of Stark & Stark’s Lawrenceville, New Jersey office, specializing in Accident & Personal Injury Law. For more information, please contact Mr. Salmon.

Can A Court Grant Access to Your Personal Information on Social Media Sites During Your Case?

Although Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and other forms of social media are great ways of staying in touch with family and friends, there are obvious risks associated with each one of these social mediums. Just look at the evening news to see story after story about public figures demolishing their careers through mistakes made on social media sites.

In the legal context (civil litigation), aside from the obvious (constitutional right to free speech and privacy) we are seeing demands from defense attorneys and insurance companies for access to Facebook and Myspace accounts, cell phone records, Google history and various other mediums. Which brings us to the issue of what is and what is not “discoverable” in the civil litigation context.  

Can someone involved in your case be granted access to pictures of your vacation that you shared with family online?  If you are involved in an accident, does the other side have access to your Facebook account?  Are they entitled to view my personal posts to friends?  

Laws answering these questions are new and unsettled.  For now, the admissibility is a decision for the judge who must balance the relevance with the potential prejudice or hardship to the parties.  But, you can be sure the defense will at least ask for this information.  So, for now, we advise our clients: if you e-mail, facebook, myspace or utilize any other social media to discuss your accident or injuries, you need to at least assume that this information (i.e. pictures, communication, funny little captions, e-mails, etc.) could be discovered. 

Andrew Salmon is a member of Stark & Stark’s Lawrenceville, New Jersey office, specializing in Accident & Personal Injury Law. For more information, please contact Mr. Salmon.

When is a Sports Injury Cause for A Lawsuit?

In a previous post, I discussed the issue of “assumption of risk. Although pure “assumption of risk” no longer exists in codified form in New Jersey, if you were to just ask John Doe about the topic of sports injuries, chances are he would say, “hey, you chose to play a sport like football or hockey or soccer, and you get injured, it’s your fault.”

In a recent New York Times article, ESPN’s Chris Mortensen wrote about the growing concussion problem in The National Football League (NFL), and how the NFL has been under increased pressure to correct it. The article was in response to a concussion suffered by Cleveland Brown’s quarterback Colt McCoy. McCoy suffered a hard hit during a Thursday night game against the Pittsburgh Steelers. He came to the side-lines and (some say) was obviously shaken up.  But, because he did not complain of concussion like symptoms (dizziness, vision, headaches), the Brown’s staffers only checked the quarterbacks hand before putting him back onto the field. It wasn't until Friday morning that McCoy was administered the mandatory Sport Concussion Assessment Tool review, commonly referred to as SCAT 2, which doctors determined was abnormal.

 The troublesome issue, and subject of this and many other related articles, was that the test was not administered Thursday night when the injury was initially suspected. What made matters worse for the Browns organizations was that McCoy's symptoms were evident at the team's public relations interview after the game, when staff asked that the television cameras not use their lights, fearing McCoy would be light sensitive. What does that tell you?  

Not many of us feel a great deal of sympathy for the players. Yes, football is a brutal sport and by the time the players get to the pro level, each knows there are risks associated with playing.  And, most of us feel, “heck, these guys are getting millions of dollars a year to play a game.”

Is it any different for an 18-20 year old college athlete? In 2006 a 19 year old La Salle University football player suffered a concussion after a hit during practice. But, before he was fully healed, he was cleared to return to play. n a game after that, he was struck again (in probably what seemed like a typical football hit) but amounted to a “second impact syndrome” and caused significant and permanent brain damage to him.

Who makes that decision to put him back on the field?  The 19 year old trying to carve out his place on a college team?  The trained professional staff the player’s parents entrusted with their young adult child?

At the local level, we have ball fields all over this state for recreational sports for every age:  middle school, prep school, high schools and colleges.  

Stark & Stark represents clients who have been injured in sports-related injuries.  We understand the legal obligations for all parties to these sporting activities and we understand the limitations on liability the current law imposes. If you would like more information on sports-related injuries, please contact me to set up a free meeting here in my firm’s Lawrenceville, New Jersey office.

Contact Us

How can we help? Any information you provide is considered confidential and will not be shared outside of our firm.